Victoria Beckham Reportedly Moves to Hand Brooklyn Back His Trademark

The Daily Mail reports that Victoria Beckham has completed the paperwork to transfer the trademark in Brooklyn's name back to him, and the paper frames it as an olive branch to a son who has been publicly at odds with his parents. That framing is the Mail's. The verifiable part is the paperwork.

According to documents the Mail says were lodged with the UK Intellectual Property Office, Victoria took out the trademark in Brooklyn's name in December 2016. It expires this December, and at renewal Brooklyn can handle it through his own legal team. A source told the paper that the family registered the children's names to protect their brands when they were young, and that each son is now an adult with his own career.

The bigger story is Brooklyn's January statement, in which he said his parents 'attempted to bribe me into signing away the rights to my name'. That is his allegation, and the parents' side is not on the record here. An industry insider told the Mail the agreement was tied to David selling a majority stake in DB Ventures in 2022 and was meant to carve the children out of commercial partners' rights. Page Six, citing its own anonymous source, reported a phone call before Brooklyn's wedding in which Victoria allegedly said 'Daddy has a very big deal, you need to sign this contract'. Two anonymous accounts, two readings, no confirmation from either side.

What strikes me is how much emotional weight a renewal form is now carrying. A trademark is about as romantic as a parking permit, yet it has been asked to deliver a family reunion. One source says Victoria 'actively sought' a smooth handover, and another hopes for 'meaningful reconciliation in time'. The first is a claim about process. The second is a wish, and it is not an event.

The Mail says it contacted Beckham's representatives for comment, and the piece includes no response. Until someone on the record speaks, the reliable story is modest: paperwork may be moving, and a family dispute is still very much in the room. Whether that adds up to an olive branch is a question the documents cannot answer.