That is the development supported by the available record, and it is also where the certainty ends. The MaltaToday item is available here only as an RSS summary. It does not identify the mayor by name, does not say who withdrew the order, and does not set out the legal basis for the move.
Those omissions are not technicalities. A freezing order is a serious constraint, and the difference between a politician announcing a change and a court formally recording one is the difference between a public claim and a documented legal step. On the evidence available, the verified point is limited: MaltaToday reported that the prime minister said the order had been withdrawn.
Without the underlying article or court record, there is no solid ground here for anything broader about why the order was lifted, what prompted it, or what it means for any related case in Paola.
Harvey Jr.
Ryan C
Dua Mifsud