Because the available source here is only an RSS summary, the firm ground is limited: the institute says the piece shows what “these destructive dynamics” look like in everyday life and how to communicate differently. That is enough to describe the event, and not enough to pretend we have the full argument in front of us.
Even at summary length, the appeal is obvious. A lot of relationship advice survives on vagueness. This promises pattern recognition instead: notice the damaging exchange as it happens, then try another way of speaking. Sometimes that kind of naming is the whole entry point.
Marcus Azzopardi 
Harvey Jr.