According to Times of Malta, the works covered around one kilometre, from Triq Tal-Gruwa to the existing dam. They included the removal of vegetation from about 11,700 square metres and the removal of roughly 24,500 cubic metres of sediment and accumulated material.
The ministry said this reopened sections of the valley that had filled over time, improving its capacity to collect and channel rainwater. That is the official case for the project, and it is a practical one: capacity, flow, accumulation, removal. Valleys are discussed here in cubic metres and square metres because that is how governments like to make intervention sound precise.
Gozo Minister Clint Camilleri said the works were intended to reduce risks linked to water accumulation while protecting soil, indigenous vegetation and biodiversity. He said particular attention was given to invasive species, especially reeds, which he said spread rapidly, obstruct water flow and compete with indigenous vegetation.
There is no real dispute in the source about what was done. The more interesting tension is in how such work gets described. “Clean-up” can mean careful rehabilitation, but it can also smooth over the fact that moving sediment, stripping vegetation and reopening a valley are environmental acts as well as engineering ones. The ministry says soil conservation and the regeneration of natural vegetation are integral parts of the intervention. That makes the language of protection part of the project itself, not just its justification.
Mġarr ix-Xini is one of seven Gozitan valleys included in a wider clean-up programme that, earlier this year, was criticised by Momentum, which sought details about the work’s environmental impact, cost and oversight.
For now, the documented facts are modest but clear: a valley section was cleared, sediment was removed, invasive reeds were targeted, and the ministry says the result is better rainwater management at Mġarr ix-Xini.
Sophia Borg
Isla Camilleri
Dua Mifsud
Harvey Jr.