Home/ Health/ 25 August 2026
AI Digest
15 Sources Updated 11h ago Evening Edition 2 min read

Belly Fat Wins: BMI Lost This Argument

BMI was designed in the 1830s by a Belgian mathematician — a tool meant for population studies, not individual diagnosis.

AI-generated digest · 15 verified sources · Updated twice daily Add as preferred source
What You Missed Today
LiveChat
LiveChat
36,000 companies use LiveChat to convert more visitors into paying customers.
Learn more →
Ranked.ai
Ranked.ai
SEO content at scale without a content team. Ranked.ai handles research, writing and publishing.
Learn more →
Proton
Proton
Your email is read by Google. Proton Mail is end-to-end encrypted. Switch.
Learn more →
Marblism
Marblism
From idea to deployable web application without writing a line of code. Marblism.
Learn more →
Mercury
Mercury
300,000 founders bank with Mercury. Most of them never set foot in the US.
Learn more →

Belly Fat Wins: BMI Lost This Argument

There is a woman I know in Valletta — sharp, well-dressed, the kind of person who tracks everything — who was told by her doctor that her BMI was fine. She felt reassured. She shouldn't have been, quite yet.

A study published this month makes a case that the medical world has been quietly building for years: the number on the scale, divided by your height squared, tells you surprisingly little about your heart. What tells you more is the fat you carry around your middle — specifically, the visceral kind, the fat that wraps around your organs and behaves less like storage and more like an active, inflammatory presence in your body. Researchers found that belly fat measurements predicted cardiovascular disease risk with significantly greater accuracy than BMI, even in people whose weight sits within the so-called normal range.

This matters more than it sounds. BMI was designed in the 1830s by a Belgian mathematician — a tool meant for population studies, not individual diagnosis. It cannot distinguish between muscle and fat, cannot tell you where the fat lives, and says nothing about what your body is doing at a cellular level. A person with a healthy BMI and a soft, expanded waistline can carry more cardiovascular risk than someone heavier whose fat distributes differently. The number has been doing a job it was never designed to do.

What the research suggests is that waist circumference, and particularly the waist-to-hip ratio, is a more honest proxy for risk. The measurement is unglamorous and takes thirty seconds. It doesn't require a machine or a referral. For women, a waist circumference above 80 centimetres begins to signal elevated risk; above 88, the signal sharpens considerably. For men, those thresholds are 94 and 102.

The Mediterranean summers we move through here — the ones that make you want to eat late and move little — are exactly the conditions under which visceral fat accumulates quietly. The cortisol that comes with heat and disrupted sleep deposits fat precisely where you don't want it, deep and central rather than peripheral.

None of this is reason for alarm. It is reason for better information.

What you can do tomorrow: Take a tape measure and check your waist circumference at the level of your navel, relaxed, after exhaling. Write the number down. That single measurement may tell you more than any scale reading ever has.

Editor's Note
The BMI conversation has been settled in endocrinology for at least a decade — the interesting question now is why GPs are still the last to know.
Isla Camilleri
Isla Camilleri
Global Affairs & Lifestyle Editor
Isla Camilleri lost her mother at four, grew up in every city her diplomat father was posted to, married at 22 and left at 23, and came back to Malta to open a café-boutique in Valletta that sells couture and coffee to people who understand both. She covers the world the way someone searches for something — thoroughly, and without quite finding it.
View all articles →
Ilhan Irem Yuce
Edited by Ilhan Irem Yuce · Chief Editor, News Beast