Home/ Cinema & Series/ 12 July 2026
AI Digest
10 Sources Updated 1d ago Evening Edition 2 min read

Screen Tests: The Gap Between Star and Story

Take Morgan Spector, currently in talks to play Robert Langdon in Netflix's Da Vinci Code sequel series.

AI-generated digest · 10 verified sources · Updated twice daily Add as preferred source
Overview
There is a particular kind of Hollywood mathematics that nobody in the industry likes to say out loud: the star and the role are not the same thing, and pretending otherwise is what keeps the box office analysts employed.
Take Morgan Spector, currently in talks to play Robert Langdon in [Netflix](https://freemalta.com/markets/company-stories/netflix)'s Da Vinci Code sequel series.
On paper, the casting makes a specific kind of sense — Spector has spent three seasons of *The Gilded Age* playing a man who walks into rooms and rearranges their gravity, which is more or less the entire job description for Langdon.
Tom Hanks brought a kind of rumpled credibility to the role, the intellectual everyman who trips through European cathedrals decoding symbology at speed.
Whether that's what the character needs or what the character needed all along is the more interesting question, and I find myself genuinely curious rather than sceptical, which doesn't happen often.

There is a particular kind of Hollywood mathematics that nobody in the industry likes to say out loud: the star and the role are not the same thing, and pretending otherwise is what keeps the box office analysts employed.

Take Morgan Spector, currently in talks to play Robert Langdon in Netflix's Da Vinci Code sequel series. On paper, the casting makes a specific kind of sense — Spector has spent three seasons of *The Gilded Age* playing a man who walks into rooms and rearranges their gravity, which is more or less the entire job description for Langdon. Tom Hanks brought a kind of rumpled credibility to the role, the intellectual everyman who trips through European cathedrals decoding symbology at speed. Spector brings something colder and more precise. Whether that's what the character needs or what the character needed all along is the more interesting question, and I find myself genuinely curious rather than sceptical, which doesn't happen often.

The counterargument to optimism sits right next to it in the news: Jason Momoa's remake of *Eraser* opened and disappeared, joining a growing list of films where the lead's charisma was treated as a substitute for architecture. It isn't. It never was. Momoa is genuinely magnetic in the right material — the problem is that nobody building these projects seems to ask whether the material is right before greenlighting the poster. The result is a decade full of expensive, beautiful, empty vessels. One actor apparently connects several of the biggest flops of the 2020s, which I'd find funny if it weren't also mildly depressing as a structural observation about how Hollywood still mistakes presence for story.

Elsewhere: *Moana*'s live-action remake opened to forty-five million dollars, which sounds like money until you remember what the animated sequel did. Disney keeps translating its best work into a format that flattens it, and audiences keep showing up just enough to make the lesson ambiguous.

What I'm actually watching: Tsai Ming-liang's *The Hole* is getting its first US theatrical run in new 35mm prints, and if that sentence means anything to you, you already know why it matters. A rain-drenched apocalypse in Taipei, shot in 1998, more alive than most of what opened this summer. Some films don't age. They just wait.

The rest of it — the MCU challenger, the *Cape Fear* Apple thriller, Olivia Wilde shooting a dinner party in one apartment and calling it cinema — can wait for next week, when I've decided how I feel.

The gap between a star and a story is exactly as wide as the box office report says it is.

Dua Mifsud
Dua Mifsud
Culture, Fashion & Gen Z Editor
View all articles →
Ilhan Irem Yuce
Edited by Ilhan Irem Yuce · Chief Editor, News Beast