Backlink Leaderboard · Head-to-Head Comparison
Educator Tools
#136 of 310 · LDS 5.2
VS
SubmitJuice
#138 of 310 · LDS 5.2
Comparing Link Dilution Score, AI visibility, Domain Rating and dofollow status. Scores are calculated using the FreeMalta LDS formula — not Domain Rating alone. How we calculate →
Score comparison
Educator Tools vs SubmitJuice
Link Dilution Score (LDS)
AI Visibility Score
Domain Rating (DR)
Full breakdown
Every metric, side by side.
Metric
Educator Tools
SubmitJuice
LDS Score
5.2
5.2
AI Visibility
3.3
2.2
AI Stars
★
★
Domain Rating
29
29
Link Type
Dofollow
Dofollow
Pricing
Paid
$197
Category
Ai
Ai
Traffic
13K
973
AI Cited
—
—
Verdict
What the scores actually mean.
Too close to call.
Educator Tools and SubmitJuice are within 0.5 LDS points of each other. Both are valid backlink sources — your choice should depend on which is easier to get listed on and which fits your content strategy.
Platform detail
What each platform actually is.
DR29 Educator Tools grants a dofollow spot. Its structured catalog populates knowledge graphs for Copilot answer synthesis for micro-SaaS creators.
Rank#136 / 310
LDS5.2
AI Score3.3 ★
DR29
Link typeDofollow
PricingPaid
Secure a dofollow link on DR29 SubmitJuice. It primes answer engine retrieval for Gemini & Copilot, perfectly targeted at mobile app builders.
Rank#138 / 310
LDS5.2
AI Score2.2 ★
DR29
Link typeDofollow
Pricing$197
Also compare
Other Ai platforms.
Dang AI
Educator Tools vs Dang AI
LDS 8.2
There’s An AI For That
Educator Tools vs There’s An AI For That
LDS 8
Tool Pilot
Educator Tools vs Tool Pilot
LDS 8
Toolify AI
Educator Tools vs Toolify AI
LDS 7.9
magicbox.tools
Educator Tools vs magicbox.tools
LDS 7.8
Future Tools
Educator Tools vs Future Tools
LDS 7.7
Scores are calculated using the FreeMalta Link Dilution Score (LDS) formula. Domain Rating data sourced from Ahrefs. AI citation status based on verified testing across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and Google AI Overviews. Data updated periodically — always verify with current tools before making link building decisions.