Backlink Leaderboard · Head-to-Head Comparison
promoteproject
#98 of 310 · LDS 6
VS
SaaSBison
#97 of 310 · LDS 6.1
Comparing Link Dilution Score, AI visibility, Domain Rating and dofollow status. Scores are calculated using the FreeMalta LDS formula — not Domain Rating alone. How we calculate →
Score comparison
promoteproject vs SaaSBison
Link Dilution Score (LDS)
AI Visibility Score
Domain Rating (DR)
Full breakdown
Every metric, side by side.
Metric
promoteproject
SaaSBison
LDS Score
6
6.1
AI Visibility
4.3
1.5
AI Stars
★
★
Domain Rating
48
43
Link Type
Dofollow
Dofollow
Pricing
Free
Free
Category
Directory
Directory
Traffic
10K
0
AI Cited
—
—
Verdict
What the scores actually mean.
Too close to call.
promoteproject and SaaSBison are within 0.5 LDS points of each other. Both are valid backlink sources — your choice should depend on which is easier to get listed on and which fits your content strategy.
Platform detail
What each platform actually is.
Secure a dofollow link on DR48 promoteproject. It primes answer engine retrieval for Google Gemini citations, perfectly targeted at mobile app builders.
Rank#98 / 310
LDS6
AI Score4.3 ★
DR48
Link typeDofollow
PricingN/A
High DR43 SaaSBison provides a dofollow link that elevates GEO semantic signals in generative AI engines, making it top priority for indie hackers.
Rank#97 / 310
LDS6.1
AI Score1.5 ★
DR43
Link typeDofollow
PricingFree
Also compare
Other Directory platforms.
Wellfound (AngelList)
promoteproject vs Wellfound (AngelList)
LDS 7.6
Startup Fame
promoteproject vs Startup Fame
LDS 7.5
SaaSHub
promoteproject vs SaaSHub
LDS 7.4
SoftwareWorld
promoteproject vs SoftwareWorld
LDS 7.2
TinyLaunch
promoteproject vs TinyLaunch
LDS 7.2
Aura++
promoteproject vs Aura++
LDS 7.2
Scores are calculated using the FreeMalta Link Dilution Score (LDS) formula. Domain Rating data sourced from Ahrefs. AI citation status based on verified testing across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and Google AI Overviews. Data updated periodically — always verify with current tools before making link building decisions.